Home Blog Page 19

Huntingdon Settlement Agreement Solicitors

0
Huntingdon Settlement Agreement Solicitors

settlement agreement richardEmployment solicitor Richard assists clients in the Huntingdon region.

Richard can help you to achieve successful outcomes, whether that’s a quick simple sign-off, where the deal is reasonable and you’re happy to sign, or negotiating better financial terms or changes to the settlement agreement wording.

He also advises on all aspects of employment law, such as claims in the employment tribunal involving unfair dismissal, discrimination at work, restrictive covenants, breach of contract, sexual harassment and maternity and pregnancy discrimination.

Richard is pleased to offer a free initial consultation and has signed up to our Cost Promise.


IMPORTANT: The contents of this page are for general guidance only and should not therefore be regarded as constituting legal or other advice or recommendations. You are free to instruct any solicitor you wish. The client testimonials on this page have been reproduced from Rebecca’s LinkedIn Account (dated December 2014).

Bonuses and Settlement Agreements

0

By Lauren Hiller – Employment Solicitor at Slater & Gordon Solicitors.

If a significant part of your earnings comes in the form of a bonus, then this is going to be an important point to consider in any settlement agreement.  It can be a key issue with regard to the timing of a departure; employers often dismiss employees just before bonus time so as to deprive them of the payment, and a resigning employee will want to wait until the money is in the bank before they hand in their notice.   Bonus entitlement is a complex area and it may well be necessary to take legal advice, but this note will take you through some of the key questions to consider.  

 Documentation

The first step is to look at all the bonus documentation.  This may include;

·         Your employment contract

·         Your offer letter

·         A staff handbook

·         A separate bonus scheme document

·         Any correspondence from your employer about your bonus entitlement

 Contractual or discretionary?

The first question to ask is whether the bonus scheme is guaranteed under contract or is at the discretion of your employer.  Look carefully at the wording in the bonus documentation to see how much room for manoeuvre your employer has given itself.   It is very common to see a mixture of both contractual and discretionary elements; for example you may have a contractual right to take part in a bonus scheme, but your employer retains discretion as to the amount it awards.

If the bonus is contractual, then in theory it should be possible to calculate your bonus according to any formula or targets set.  However, in practice there can still be disputes, even when the targets seems to be objective.  If you have a financial target, your employer might artificially manipulate this e.g. by putting work through a different department.  And when it comes to more subjective criteria such as “interpersonal skills” or similar, these are often very vague and open to interpretation, effectively allowing an employer an element of discretion.  You should review the structure of your bonus scheme to look for any areas that could give rise to debate, and prepare your arguments to show why you have met any targets.

If the bonus is entirely discretionary, or contains elements of discretion, then you might think that you cannot challenge your employer’s decision.  However, it is an implied term of any bonus scheme that an employer cannot exercise its discretion in a way that is irrational, perverse, or in bad faith, so you may be able to challenge any decision on that basis.  It’s worth noting that zero bonuses are usually easier to challenge on that basis than low bonuses.

Important questions to ask yourself include: what bonus have you received in past years? What have others received this year? How are leavers usually treated?  What is standard practice within your industry sector?  Sometimes it is possible to argue that a bonus scheme was such a regular and important part of the employment relationship that a contractual obligation is implied “by custom and practice”.  Even if you cannot get that far, this information might help a court decide that a decision to award a low or nil bonus was an irrational exercise of discretion.  Any correspondence or verbal communications that gave you an expectation that you would receive your bonus will also be relevant.

Has notice been served?

An important point to look for is a provision in the scheme that allows your employer to withhold your bonus if your employment has been terminated, or you are under notice, on the date when the payment is due.  So the timing of your resignation, or of your employer serving notice, can be crucial.  Even if your bonus is otherwise guaranteed under the contract, if this sort of clause is included in the contract it can make it very difficult to claim your bonus.

If there is not a clause allowing your employer to withhold a bonus if notice has been served, then they might try to get around this by dismissing you without notice.  In this instance, you should check your employment contract for a payment in lieu of notice clause.  If your employment has not explicitly reserved the right to pay you in lieu of notice, and to only pay you basic salary in respect of the notice period, then you could have a claim to any bonus you would have expected to receive in the notice period.

Even if there is nothing in the documents that says no bonus is due if notice has been served, it’s worth looking at the bonus documents to see if they say anything about the purpose behind the bonus scheme.  If it mentions something about incentivising future performance, then your employer could use that as an argument that it is a reasonable exercise of its discretion not to award any bonus to an employee who is already leaving the company.  

Are you a good leaver?

Sometimes an employer will award a bonus but then defer payment for a certain period of time.  Commonly stock options are awarded instead of or additional to cash, and the dates when these options vest may be staggered over a number of years.  If your employment ends before you receive it, then payment or vesting of options are likely to be conditional on the circumstances under which your employment is terminated.  Usually, if an employee retires at a certain age or for health reasons, or if they are made redundant, they will be a “good leaver” and get to keep their bonus.  If they resign, or are sacked for poor performance or misconduct, then they might lose their bonus.  Sometimes, whatever the reason for termination, if they then go and work for a competitor, they lose their deferred bonus.  Even in otherwise water-tight contractual bonuses, it’s common for an employer to say that it can withhold bonus if there is gross misconduct.

You can see how that immediately leaves room for argument; your employer may give a reason for dismissal which you do not accept.  In that case, your negotiating position would depend on how likely you are to be able to successfully challenge the fairness of the dismissal for the purported reason.  Alternatively, you may argue that you aren’t competing – or alternatively, consider it unfair that you should lose a bonus you have earned simply because you have no choice but to go out and get a job at a competitor when you leave.  If your bonus is valuable then you may feel you have no choice but to take a different career path and join a client instead, in order to avoid losing a retained bonus.  All of this should be something you think about when you join rather than just when you leave.

Potential claims

If you are negotiating a settlement agreement, then you are doing so to avoid the need to bring any legal claims.  But it’s important to understand the value of any claims you might have, and the strengths and weaknesses of those claims, to understand your negotiating position.  Potential claims include:

Breach of contract or a deduction from wages claim – if you have a contractual entitlement to your bonus then you may be able to bring a breach of contract claim in the high court or county court, or a claim for unlawful deductions from wages in the employment tribunal

Wrongful dismissal – if you have been dismissed without the proper notice, which caused you to miss out on your bonus, you may be able to bring a claim for the earnings you would have received during your notice period.  

Unfair dismissal – if you were dismissed without a fair reason, or without your employer having followed a fair procedure, then you may be able to bring a claim for unfair dismissal that would compensate you for lost earnings, potentially including bonus.  However, it’s important to note that usually only employees with at least two years’ service can bring an unfair dismissal claim, and that damages are capped at a maximum of £74,200.  

Discrimination –  if you think that your sex, race, age, disability, sexual orientation or religion have played any part in the decision to award you a low bonus, or to sack you thereby depriving you of your bonus,  then you may have a claim under equal pay or discrimination legislation.  Unlike unfair dismissal claims, employees with less that two years’ service can bring a discrimination claim and damages are not capped.

Whistle-blowing – if you made some kind of complaint that your employer breached a legal obligation, and you think that you were awarded a low bonus or dismissed because of this, then you could have extra protection.  Your complaint might constitute a “protected disclosure” and you may be able to bring a claim ; like discrimination claims, you do not need two years’ service and damages are not capped.  

Conclusion

Bonus schemes can be complicated and if you have any doubts about where you stand, it is worth taking legal advice from an employment solicitor.  And remember, even if you think you cannot challenge non-payment of your bonus in law, it can still be worth bringing it up in negotiations.  If you have worked hard and performed well all year, then you may well feel that you have a moral claim to your bonus.   It is not unheard of for employers to have a conscience about these things; they may not offer to pay the bonus in full, but if other elements of a package are being negotiated then they may be more inclined to offer you a better deal overall to compensate you for the loss of your bonus.  


IMPORTANT: The contents of this page are general guidance only and should not therefore be regarded as constituting legal or other advice.

 

Gross Misconduct Settlement

0

Q: My employer terminated my employment last week for gross misconduct. They’ve offered me a settlement agreement paying me my months’ notice pay. I accept I was guilty of misconduct but feel the procedure was unfair and they could have given me a warning.  Also, I’ve heard I can claim compensation because my employer didn’t issue me with an employment contract. Is that right and what could I expect to get? Should I mention this to try and get better a better deal?

Jonathan Holden, Partner and Solicitors answers…

An employee who is summarily dismissed for gross misconduct is not entitled to a notice payment.  Your employer’s offer of 1 month’s pay in lieu of notice (which you may be able to receive tax-free as you do not have a written contract of employment) is therefore more favourable than you would otherwise receive.  For that reason, you may decide to accept the offer.  Alternatively, you could seek to negotiate an increase in the amount payable under the agreement; or the inclusion of, for example, a suitable reference.  However, before deciding to go down either route, you should consider the implications of signing a settlement agreement.

Once the agreement is signed, you will lose the ability to pursue any Employment Tribunal or Court claims arising out of your employment or its termination.  You are also likely to lose the ability to appeal against your dismissal on the grounds of gross misconduct.

Whilst you accept that you were guilty of misconduct, I note that you believe that the sanction you received was too harsh.  You also believe that the procedure followed by your employer was unfair.  Both of these factors are valid grounds for an appeal against your dismissal, and could also give rise to an unfair dismissal claim (assuming that you have over two years service and therefore qualify for bringing such a claim).  Your lack of a written contract of employment would not give rise to a stand-alone claim in the Employment Tribunal.  However, it could be tagged onto an unfair dismissal claim which, if successful, would result in you receiving an additional 2 or 4 weeks’ gross pay as compensation.

Taking this into account, you may choose to reject the offer of a settlement agreement in favour of pursuing an appeal (which, if successful, could result you receiving a lesser sanction).  Even if your appeal is unsuccessful, you would then still be able to consider bringing unfair dismissal claim; and you may even find that your employer is still willing to offer a settlement agreement to you after the appeal process has been exhausted.

Answer given on 9 June 2014.


IMPORTANT: The contents of this page are for guidance only and do not constitute legal advice. You should consult a solicitor without delay if you require legal advice on a particular employment matter.

Lincoln Settlement Agreement Solicitors

0

Settlement Agreement Solicitors – Lincoln, East Midlands.

If you’re in the Lincoln area and have been offered a settlement agreement, we can provide expert specialist advice and help. We offer a fast sign off service (if you’re happy with the deal) or we can negotiate your behalf to improve it. Costs are paid by your employer. 

Once signed, a settlement agreement is legally binding. That’s why it’s crucial to have specialist advice from a settlement agreement solicitor in the UK.

What are settlement agreements?

A settlement agreement is a formal agreement between an employer and an employee. The documents used to be called compromise agreements, and they’re covered in the Employment Rights Act 1996. Once the agreement is signed:

  • The employee receives a sum of money
  • The employee agrees not to bring certain legal claims against the employer.

For the settlement agreement to be legally binding it has to comply in certain ways, for example, it must be in writing, and the employee must have received legal advice from a solicitor. That’s crucial because you need to know if the deal is fair and be certain that you don’t want to bring a claim against your employer.  

We can help with Lincoln based settlement agreements.

We that losing your job or having a dispute at work can feel overwhelming and stressful. However, we have long term experience of helping people reach the best outcomes possible with their settlement agreements. Getting the right advice means we can ensure you are getting the best deal (and negotiate on your behalf if you’re not) and allow you to sign your settlement agreement and move on.

IMPORTANT: The contents of this page are general guidance only and should not therefore be regarded as constituting legal or other advice or recommendations. You are free to instruct any solicitor you wish.

Derogatory Comments and Settlement Agreements.

Q:  “I am leaving my employment under a settlement agreement and it contains a clause which states that I will not say anything bad about my employer after the termination of my employment. Can they stop me doing this and what would happen if I spoke about them after I’ve signed the agreement? They can’t stop me telling the truth about them, can they?”

Employment Solicitor Ian Carey answers…..

General background

It is very common for employers to include such clauses in settlement agreements. For many employers, limiting the reputational damage to the organisation from an employment dispute is an important reason for entering into a settlement agreement with an employee. 

A non-derogatory statement clause (more colloquially known as a non-slagging off clause) will be drafted in a variety of ways each with varying levels of obligation. It is important for you to understand the effect of the clause and to make sure you fully understand the legal obligations arising from it. If you are unclear on any aspect, then you should seek further advice from your independent legal adviser prior to signing the settlement agreement.

 Seek a reciprocal clause

If your settlement agreement contains such a clause then the settlement agreement should be checked by your independent legal adviser to see whether your employer is subject to a similar clause and if not, then a reciprocal clause should be inserted into the agreement for your benefit i.e. a clause that states that your employer agrees not to make any bad comments about you.

Please note, it is likely that any reciprocal clause on an employer will be drafted using such words as “best endeavours” or “reasonable endeavours”. This is arguably a less onerous obligation but is usually considered necessary unless your employer is a sole trader. Where your employer is an organisation comprising of a number of persons, then “best endeavours” or the lesser “reasonable endeavours” is commonly used because whilst you as an individual can control your own actions, it is more difficult for the employer consisting of a group of persons to do so. 

Can an employer stop me making bad comments?

The short answer is yes – although they can’t “gag” you in a physical sense, it is legitimate (and common) to include legal obligations on an employee in a settlement agreement regarding confidentiality which will include a non-derogatory statement clause. 

As mentioned above, an employer is unlikely to pay settlement sums to an employee without having some ability to limit the reputational damage arising from the employment dispute.  

What would happen if I spoke about them after I’ve signed the agreement?

This will depend on how the non-derogatory statement clause is drafted and the extent to which you have breached it.

In theory, any breach of the clause is actionable by an employer on the basis of being a breach of contract although in order for a court to award damages i.e. compensation to be paid by you, the employer would have to show that some loss flowed from the breach.

 In addition, if the employer was concerned about the breach and could show that damages were an inadequate remedy, then it may seek an injunction to prevent you from making further damaging comments in breach of the clause although the circumstances would have to be such to justify such injunctive relief.

In any event, much will depend on the severity of the breach.

One end of the spectrum may be a former junior employee being overheard in a restaurant telling a close friend about “their former employer” and painting them in an unsavoury light. Although this would be a breach, it is hardly likely to lead to any serious loss unless the friend happens to be a major customer of the employer and decides to cease business relations as a consequence or is a journalist who decides to publish “an exclusive story”.

At the other end of the spectrum, a former aggrieved board director with considerable influence in a business sector starts a sustained social media campaign against his former PLC employer giving a “warts and all” insight into why the business is failing which leads to a dramatic fall in the PLC’s share price and the cancellation of several lucrative contracts.

In the latter case, the losses suffered may be very significant and the former board director is likely to be on the receiving end of prolonged and costly litigation.

Settlement sums may be conditional upon compliance

Regardless of these factors, employees should be aware that many employers will make the payment of the settlement sums conditional upon the employee complying with their obligations under the settlement agreement. Therefore, it could be a very costly mistake to make a bad comment about your former employer in breach of your obligations under the agreement because your employer may then refuse to pay to you the settlement sums due to you under the agreement or if they have already been paid to you, seek to recover those sums from you together with interest.

They can’t stop me telling the truth about them, can they?

For the reasons set out above, in practical terms that is the effect of a non-derogatory statement clause which you would be best advised to observe unless you wanted to run the risk of litigation and/or the loss or recovery of the settlement sums paid by the employer.

The only exceptional circumstances where a former employee would be relieved from complying with their legal obligations regarding non-derogatory statements are usually specified as being in order to make protected disclosures e.g. whistleblowing or by court order e.g. giving evidence under oath in legal proceedings.

By Ian Carey – Employment Solicitor

Answer given February 2016


IMPORTANT: The contents of this article are for guidance only and do not amount to legal advice.